Материалы представленные на сайте исключительно с целью ознакомления пользователям Интернета и не преследуют коммерческих целей или нарушение авторских прав.
© 2018 - 2025
The results of this research show that independent variables (perceived usefulness, social influence, cost of service, perceived ease of use and perceived trust) has significant direct effect on the citizens’ behavioral intention to use mobile government and indirect effect on the actual use behavior. Among all those affects, social influence has the strongest effect on the user’s intention to use mobile government.
Conclusion.
A. Wider implications.
This study will help the public organizations and governments to gain more understanding about what drives the development and acceptance of mobile government services.
b) Contribution to the previous studies.
This study contributes to the previous studies by analyzing the effect of social influence, perceived usefulness, cost of service, perceived trust and perceived ease of use on behavioral intention to use mobile government.
c) The perspectives of study.
In our future research, we are going to study the mediated factors that might affect the citizens' acceptance of mobile government.
Pick out from the previous thesis plan the relevant information for the detailed summary and write it down.
Summary
Almarashdeh, I., . Alsmadi, M. K. (2017). How to make them use it? Citizens acceptance of M-government. Applied Computing and Informatics , 13(2), 194-199. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aci.2017.04.001
With the evolution of mobile technologies and its applications, more and more government agencies encourage citizens to use mobile government services, which have potential to facilitate the citizens life by saving the physical efforts and enhancing the citizen’s accessibility to online services. Since the user acceptance is one of the critical success factors of mobile government this study aims to measure it by investigating the important factors that play a main role in the citizen’s perspective. On the basis of existing technology acceptance models and theories (TAM and UTAUT) is developed an evaluation framework which includes such causal-related model factors as: social influence, cost of services, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, behavioral intention.
An evaluation framework is developed on the basis of existing technology acceptance models and theories (TAM and UTAUT). It includes such model factors as: social influence, cost of services, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, behavioral intention. Then the researcher conducts reliability tests for each construct to assess the goodness of measure, and indicate accuracy in measurement. The total reliability test of the 28 items (the questionnaire items available in the Appendix) used in this study is 0.902 which shows well-structured data. For analyzing the validation of the structured two models were used: measurement model and the structural model (SEM AMOS 18), the later is the best for analyzing the strength of casual relationship of the constructs. The paths analysis shows that all model hypotheses are supported and have significant affect at the 0.01 level. Thus the proposed framework is empirically tested by structural equation modeling using data collected from a structured questionnaire.
The results of this research show that independent variables (perceived usefulness, social influence, cost of service, perceived ease of use and perceived trust) has significant direct effect on the citizens’ behavioral intention to use mobile government and indirect effect on the actual use behavior. Among all those affects, social influence has the strongest effect on the user’s intention to use mobile government.
The authors consider that this study will help the public organizations and governments to gain more understanding about what drives the development and acceptance of mobile government services and they are going in their future research to study the mediated factors that might affect the citizens' acceptance of mobile government.
V. Tasks
Task 1. Make up your own summary to the above article. Compare it with the previous one and give your explanation.
Task 2. Give your variants of compressed summary, what information can be omitted while making the more general summary.
Task 3. Make up informative and indicative abstracts of this article. Compare them with the Abstract for this article.
Task 4. Take the English journal article in your field of study and make up the summary of it.
REFERENCES TO PART I
1. Andrade, C. (2011). How to write a good abstract for a scientific paper or conference presentation. Indian J Psychiatry, 53(2), 172–175. Retrieved 22.November, 2017 from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136027/
2. Berzon V.E. Klassifikatsiya konnektorov i dialogovyie sistemyi avtomaticheskogo referirovaniya / V.E. Berzon, A.B. Braylovskiy // NTI. – 1979. – Ser. 2. –# 11.– S. 19–23.
3. Blyumenau D.I. Problemyi svertyivaniya nauchnoy informatsii / D.I. Blyumenau. – L. : Nauka, 1982. – 166 s.
4. Chernyiy A.I. Podgotovka baz dannyih i informatsionnyih izdaniy po estestvennyim i tehnicheskim naukam: sovremennyiy vzglyad i perspektivyi / A.I. Chernyiy // Mezhdunar.forum po inform. – 2000. – # 2. – S. 3–12.
5. Court, D. L., Kiefer, K. &. Reid, S. (n.d.). How to Write Summary. Retrieved August 21, 2017 from http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/guide.cfm?guideid=30.
6. Dickson, S. V., Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (1995). Text organization and its relation to reading comprehension: A synthesis of research. Eugene, OR: National Center to Improve the Tools of Educators. Retrieved March 26, 2008, from http://idea.uoregon.edu/~ncite/documents/techrep/tech17.html
7. Dymock, S. (2005). Teaching Expository Text Structure Awareness. The Reading Teacher, 59(2), 177-181.
8. Egorova E.K. Osnovyi annotirovaniya i referirovaniya angliyskogo teksta : metodicheskie rekomendatsii dlya prepodavateley i studentov // E.K. Egorova, S.I. Kalinina. – M., 1974. – 16 s.
9. English Language Arts Standards » Science & Technical Subjects . http://www.corestandards.org/ELA-Literacy/RST/introduction
10. GOST 7.9-95. Referat i annotatsiya. Obschie trebovaniya. Vved. 01.07.97 / GOST 7.9-95. // Standartyi po izdatelskomu delu. – M., 1998. – S. 132–
11. GrebInnik G.Yu. Anotuvannya ta referuvannya anglIyskoyu movoyu zagalnonaukovoYi ta fahovoYi lIteraturi / G.Yu. GrebInnik, G.I. DIdovich, G.V. Komova – H. : NTU «HPI», 2010. – 192 s.
12. How to Write an Abstract - Carnegie Mellon University
https://users.ece.cmu.edu/~koopman/essays/abstract.html
13. How to Write an Abstract (with Examples) - wikiHow
https://www.wikihow.com/Write-an-Abstract
14. Ippolitova, N.A. Tekst v sisteme obucheniya russkomu yazyiku v shkole / N.A. Ippolitova. – M.: Flinta-Nauka, 2001.
15. Kathleen Cali. Organization. Retrieved December 1, 2017 from http://www.learnnc.org/lp/people/59
16. Kalnichenko A.A. Referirovanie i referativnyiy perevod novostey iz angloyazyichnoy pressyi : ucheb. posobie dlya studentov fak. «Referent-perevodchik» / A.A. Kalnichenko ; Nar. ukr. akad. – H., 2001.–108 s.
17. Knyazeva E.G. Obuchenie referirovaniyu kak rechemyislitelnoy deyatelnosti / L.L. 12. Nelyubin, E.G. Knyazeva // Perevodovedcheskaya lingvodidaktika ucheb.-metod. posobie. – 3-e izd., pererab. i dop. – M. : Flinta-Nauka, 2009. – S. 142–151.
18. Kovalchuk T.I. Lingvisticheskie harakteristiki referativnogo zhanra i obuchayuschiy potentsial referirovaniya / T.I. Kovalchuk. – K. : Naukova dumka, 1980. – 27 s.
19. Kolodyazhnaya, Zh.A. Osnovnyie ponyatiya ob annotirovanii i referirovanii nauchnyih dokumentov / Zh.A. Kolodyazhnaya // Istochniki nauch.-tehn. Informatsii i ih analitiko-sinteticheskaya obrabotka. – m., 2002. – S. 25-45.
20. Lame Deer, J., & Erdoes, R. (1998). Talking to the Owls and Butterflies. In T. H. Crusius and C. E. Channell, The Aims of Argument: A Rhetoric and Reader, 2e; pp. 209-215. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield..
21. Leonov V.P. Referirovanie i annotirovanie nauchno-tehnicheskoy
literaturyi / V.P. Leonov. – Novosibirsk : Nauka, 1986. – 176 s.
22. Markushevskaya L.P. Annotirovanie i referirovanie: metodicheskie rekomendatsii dlya samostoyatelnoy rabotyi studentov / L.P. Markushevskaya, Yu.A. Tsapaeva. – SPb. : SPb GU ITMO, 2008. – 51 s.
23. Manning, A.D. Chapter three. Narrative. Available at http://linguistics.byu.edu/classes/Ling230am/writing_chapters/Writing_Stories.
24. Nesterova N.M. Referativnyiy perevod: problema smyislovogo svertyivaniya i semanticheskoy adekvatnosti / N.M. Nesterova // Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2011. – # 25 (240). – Vyip. 58. – S. 112–118.
25. Novikov A.I. Referativnyiy perevod nauchno-tehnicheskih tekstov / A.I. Novikov, N.M. Nesterova. – M. : Nauka, 1991. – 149 s.
26. Osnovi perekladatskogo anotuvannya ta referuvannya tekstIv rIznih tipIv I zhanrIv : navchalniy posIbnik / K.V. VoronIna – H. : HNU ImenIV.N. KarazIna, 2013. – 120 s.
27. OsnovnI metodi avtomatizovanogo referuvannya [Elektronniy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupu : http://uadocs.exdat.com/docs/index-140602.html
28. Osnovyi informatsionno-bibliograficheskoy kulturyi [Elektronniy resurs] // Tsentr informatsionno-bibliotechnogo obespecheniya uchebno-nauchnoy deyatelnosti NIYaU MIFI, distantsionnyiy kurs NIYaU MIFI. – Rezhim dostupu: http://library.mephi.ru/icb2/book.html
29. Shapovalova T.R. Referirovanie i annotirovanie spetsialnyih tekstov na inostrannom yazyike : uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie / sost. : T.R. Shapovalova, G.V. Tityaeva. – Yuzhno-Sahalinsk : Izd-vo SahGU, 2012. – 122 s.
30. Simonsen, S. (1996). Identifying and Teaching Text Structures in Content Area Classrooms. In D. Lapp, J. Flood, & N. Farnan (Eds.), Content Area reading and Learning: Instructional Strategies (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
31. Slavina, G. I. Annotirovanie i referirovanie po angliyskomu yazyiku / G. I. Slavina, Z.S. Harkovskiy. – M.: Vyisshaya shkola, 2006.
32. Slavina G.I. Annotirovanie i referirovanie. Posobie po angliyskomu yazyiku / G.I. Slavina, Z.S. Harkovskiy, E.A. Antonova, M.A. Ryibakina. – M. : Vyissh. shk., 1991. – 156 s.
33. SmIrnova E.S. AnglIyska mova : navch.-metod. posIb. // E.S. SmIrnova, G.A. Cherednichenko. – K. : NUHT, 2011. – 180 s.
34. Solovev V.I. Sostavlenie i redaktirovanie referatov: voprosyi teorii i praktiki / V.I. Solovev // Zhanryi informatsionnoy literaturyi: obzor. Referat. – M., 1983. – 325 s.
35. Soroka M.B. NatsIonalna sistema referuvannya ukraYinskoYi naukovoYi lIteraturi [Elektronniy resurs] / M.B. Soroka ; NAN UkraYini, Nats. b-ka UkraYini ImenI V.I. Vernadskogo. – K. : NBUV, 2002. – 212 s. – Rezhim dostupu : http://archive.nbuv.gov.ua/libdoc/02smbunl.htm
36. Shamurin E.I. Metodika sostavleniya annotatsiy / E.I. Shamurin. – M., 1959. – 230 s.
Varenko V.M. Referentna sprava. Navchalniy posIbnik / V.M. Varenko. – K. : Kondor, 2008. – 212 s.
37. Shirley V. Dickson, Deborah C. et al. Text organization and its relation to reading comprehension: a synthesis of the research. Retrieved December 4 from http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS111971
38. Spiegel, D. L. (1981). Six alternatives to the directed reading activity. The Reading Teacher, 34, 914-922.
39. Vasileva M.A. Obuchenie referirovaniyu nauchnoy literaturyi / M.A. Vasileva, E.I. Zakgeym. – M. : Izd-vo MGU, 1976. – 261 s.
40. Veyze A.A. Chtenie, referirovanie i annotirovanie inostrannogo teksta : ucheb. posobie / A.A. Veyze. – M. : Vyissh. shk., 1985. – 127 s.
41. Veyze, A.A. Smyislovaya kompressiya teksta v uchebnyih tselyah: uchebnoe posobie dlya institutov i fakultetov inostrannyih yazyikov / A.A. Veyze. – Minsk: Vyisshaya shkola, 1982.
42. Veyze, A.A. Referirovanie tehnicheskih tekstov /A.A. Veyze, N.V. Chirkov. – Minsk: Vyisshaya shkola, 1983.
43. Wikipedia : The Free Encyclopedia [Elektronniy resurs]. – Rezhim dostupu : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki.
44. Writing Guide: Critical Reading (2013, August 6). Web Site at Colorado State University
Retrieved November 27, 2017 from
http://writing.colostate.http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/guide.cfm?guideid=31.
45. Zholkova A.I. K voprosu o referirovanii nauchno-tehnicheskoy periodiki / A.I. Zholkova // NTI: referativnyiy zhurnal VINITI. – 1970. – # 5. – 27 s.
46. Zuparova L.B. Analitiko-sinteticheskaya pererabotka informatsii : uchebnik / L.B. Zuparova, T.A. Zaytseva ; pod red. Yu.N. Stolyarova. – M. : FAIR, 2008. – 400 s.
http://www.uis.edu/ctl/wp-content/uploads/sites/76/2013/03/smreabs.pdf
.https://student.unsw.edu.au/writing-critical-review
http://web.pdx.edu/~jduh/courses/faq/JouranlArticleSearch.htm
http://web.cortland.edu/hendrick/journalarticle.pdf
http://www.aims.edu/student/online-writing-lab/assignments/summarizing
<ref>https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/owlprint/930/</ref>
<ref>http://www.uis.edu/ctl/wp-content/uploads/sites/76/2013/03/smreabs.pdf</ref>
.<ref>https://student.unsw.edu.au/writing-critical-review</ref>[[
http://chnm.gmu.edu/courses/westernciv/writing/index.html#
.https://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/abstracts/
.http://www.literacymatters.org/lessons/textstructure.htm
.http://forpd.ucf.edu/strategies/strattextstructure.html
.http://www.literacymatters.org/content/text/intro.htm
http://wvde.state.wv.us/strategybank/IdentifyingTextStructure.html
.https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/owlprint/930/https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/owlprint/
PART II
CONFERENCE PRESENTATION
UNIT 1. Giving a Scientific Presentation at a Conference
Connect to Your Life
Дата: 2019-03-05, просмотров: 269.