amphibians and in the international amphibian trade. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 2007, vol. 78, no 2, pp. 87-95.
[45] Rowley J. J. L., Shepherd C. R., Stuart B. L., Nguyen T. Q., Hoang H. D., Cutajar T. P., Wogan G. O. U., Phimmachak S. Estimating the global trade in Southeast Asian newts. Biological Conservation, 2016, vol. 199, pp. 96–100.
[46] Schad K. Amphibian Population Management
Guidelines. Amphibian Ark Amphibian
Population Management Workshop; Ed. Schad, K.: December 10-11; San Diego, CA, USA. Amphibian Ark, 2007. 31 p.
[47] Schlaepfer M. A., Hoover C., Dodd Jr. C. K. Challenges in evaluating the impact of the trade in amphibians and reptiles on wild populations. Bioscience, 2002, vol. 55, no 3, pp. 256-264.
[48] Stuart S. N. Responding to the amphibian crisis: too little, too late? Alytes, 2012, vol. 29, no 1-4, pp. 9-12.
[49] Survey Monkey. Best practices for every step of survey creation for survey introduction and design. 2014. Available at: https://www.survey monkey.com/mp/survey-guidelines/?ut_source =header (Accessed December 2012)
[50] Tapley B., Bradfield K., Michaels C., Bungard M. Amphibians and conservation breeding programmes: do all threatened amphibians belong on the ark? Biodiversity Conservation, 2015, vol. 24, no 11, pp. 2625-2646.
[51] Tapley B., Michaels C., Johnson K., Field M. D. A global problem requires a global multifaceted solution. Animal Conservation, 2017, vol. 20, pp. 122–123
[52] TSA. Turtle Survival Alliance. 2015. Available at:
http://www.turtlesurvival.org/ (Accessed July
2015)
[53] Wray-Lake L., Flanagan C. A., Osgood D. W. Examining trends in adolescent environmental attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors across three decades. Environmental Behavior, 2010, vol. 42, pp. 61–85.
[54] Wren S. A. Angulo H. Meredith J., Kielgast M., Santos D., Bishop P. (eds). Amphibian Conservation Action Plan. April 2015. IUCN SSC Amphibian Specialist Group. 2015. Available at: http://www.amphibians.org/acap/ (Accessed May 2016)
[55] Young J. C., Waylen K. A., Sarkki S., Albon S., Bainbridge I., Balian E., Davidson J., Edwards D., Fairley R., Margerison C., McCracken D., Owen R., Quine C. P. , Stewart-Roper C., Thompson D., Tinch R., Van den Hove S., Watt A. Improving the science-policy dialogue to meet the challenges of biodiversity conservation: having conversations rather than talking at one-another. // Biodiversity Conservation, 2014, vol. 23, pp. 387–404.
[56] Ziegler T. Amphibian and reptilian diversity
research, conservation and breeding projects in
Vietnam. In: G. Dick, M. Gusset (eds.)
Building a Future for Wildlife: Zoos and
Aquariums Committed to Biodiversity
Conservation. WAZA Executive Office, Gland, Switzerland. 2010. Pp. 117–122
[57] Zeigler T. In situ and ex situ reptile projects of the Cologne Zoo: implications for research and conservation of South East Asia's herpeto diversity. International Zoo Yearbook, 2011, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 8-21.
[58] Ziegler T., Rauhaus A., Mutschmann F., Dang P.H., Pham C.T., Nguyen T.Q. Building up of keeping facilities and breeding projects for frogs, newts and lizards at the Me Linh Station for Biodiversity in northern Vietnam, including improvement of housing conditions for confiscated reptiles and primates. Zool. Garten N.F., 2016, vol. 85, pp. 91–120.
[59] Zippel K., Johnson K., Gagliardo R., Gibson R., McFadden M., Browne R. K., Martinez C., Townsend E. The Amphibian Ark: a global community for ex situ conservation of amphibians. Herpetological Conservation and Biology, 2011, vol. 6, pp. 340-352.
Appendix1. Some amphibian species in private keepers collections, their IUCN Redlist category as Critically Endangered (CR) Endangered (EN) Vulnerable (VU) Near Threatened (NT) Locally Common (LC) and Not Assessed (NA), approximate number in captivity, whether captive bred, domestic strains, and comments. Species sorted by Redlist category, the order as anuran (frogs and toads) or caudata (salamander sand newts). * = caudata. Note. “No. captivity” means the estimated stable quantity of adult specimens of each species in known collections (via scientific publications and press, Internet (forums, social networks etc). Species once entered hobby and then was lost as well as very common species with no protection status didn’t covered.
Scientific name | CITES, Appendix No. | No captivity | Captive bred | Domestic strains | Comments |
Critically Endangered
40
Journal of Zoological Research V2 • I1 •2018
Дата: 2019-03-05, просмотров: 231.