Поможем в ✍️ написании учебной работы

Имя

Поможем с курсовой, контрольной, дипломной, рефератом, отчетом по практике, научно-исследовательской и любой другой работой

Выберите тип работыЧасть дипломаДипломная работаКурсовая работаКонтрольная работаРешение задачРефератНаучно - исследовательская работаОтчет по практикеОтветы на билетыТест/экзамен onlineМонографияЭссеДокладКомпьютерный набор текстаКомпьютерный чертежРецензияПереводРепетиторБизнес-планКонспектыПроверка качестваЭкзамен на сайтеАспирантский рефератМагистерская работаНаучная статьяНаучный трудТехническая редакция текстаЧертеж от рукиДиаграммы, таблицыПрезентация к защитеТезисный планРечь к дипломуДоработка заказа клиентаОтзыв на дипломПубликация статьи в ВАКПубликация статьи в ScopusДипломная работа MBAПовышение оригинальностиКопирайтингДругое

Нажимая кнопку "Продолжить", я принимаю политику конфиденциальности

French and Scandinavian Borrowings in English. In ME the main donors of borrowings to English were French and Scandinavian Languages:

Basis for Comparison

French Borrowings

Scandinavian Borrowings Time

since the 11^th c. (Norman Conquest)

since the 9^th c. (Scandinavian Invasion) Number

10 000

1 000 Area

French borrowings started to penetrate from the South and spread northwards.

Scandinavian borrowings came to English from Northern and North-Eastern Dialects Ways of Borrowing

French borrowings penetrated through oral and written speech and at first were adopted only by the high strata of the society (French was the language of the administration, king’s court, law courts, church (as well as Latin) and army).

Scandinavian borrowings penetrated only through oral speech as far as the Scandinavians had never been too eager to come to the power wherever they went. They were just raiders. Assimilation of Borrowings French borrowings were more difficult to assimilate as far as French was a Romance language while English was a Germanic one (they belonged to different language groups). So they two languages differed in some essential features (stress/accent, vocalic system, etc.) and the assimilation was hard.

Scandinavian borrowings were easier to assimilate as far as the Scandinavian Dialects as well as Old English Dialects were Germanic dialects (they all belonged to one and the same language group). So the languages were very similar and the assimilation was easy.

Semantic Fields government and administration (assembly, authority, council, to govern, office, nation, etc.); feudal system (baron, countess, duke, feudal, noble, etc.); military (aid, arms, army, battle, defeat, force, etc.); law (crime, court, jury, justice, false, defendant, etc.); church (abbey, Bible, chapel, clergy, grace, etc.); art, architecture (chimney, palace, colour , figure, design, etc.); entertainment (pleasure, leasure, sport, dance, cards, etc.); address (madam, sir, mister, etc.).

everyday life (cake, raft, skirt, birth, dirt, fellow, root, window, to die, etc.);

military (knife, fleet, etc.);

legal matters (law, husband, etc.);

some pronouns and conjunctions (they, their, them, both, though, etc.);

essential notion (N scar, anger; V to call, to take, to want to kill, to cast, to scare; Adj happy, ill, weak, wrong; Pron same, both; Prep till, fro, etc.).

Recognition in ModE French borrowings are often recognisable due to some phonetic, word-building and spelling peculiarities: oi, oy (point, joy, toy, etc.); initial v (very, voice, etc.); -age (village, carriage, etc.); c as [s] (pierce, city, etc.).

Scandinavian borrowings are hard to distinguish from the native words as far as Scandinavian Dialects belonged to the same language group (Germanic). The only distinctive Scandinavian feature in English:

Scandinavian cluster [sk] (sky, skill, skin, skirt, etc.);

Contributions French borrowings enlarged the English vocabulary (a lot of new words); Some French borrowings replaced the native words (very, river, easy,etc.); French borrowings enlarged the number of synonyms in English: native to hide – Fr. borr. to conceal, native wish – Fr. borr. desire, native smell – Fr. borr. odour , etc. Some French affixes were borrowed into English ( com-, sub-, dis-, (prefixes) -ment, -ish, -able, (suffixes) etc.).

A lot of Scandinavian borrowings disappeared, some were left only in dialects;

Some Scandinavian borrowings replaced the native words (they, take, call, etc.);

Scandinavian borrowings enlarged the number of synonyms in English:

native to blossom – Scan. borr. to bloom,

native wish – Scan. borr. want,

native heaven – Scan. borr. sky , etc.

 

       

The surge of interest in the classics during the Age of the Renaissance led to a new wave of borrowings from Latin and Greek (through Latin mainly).

 

Latin	Greek
abstract concepts (anticipate, exact, exaggerate, explain, fact, dislocate, accommodation, etc. )	theatre (drama, episode, scene, theatre, etc.)
	literature (anapest, climax, epilogue, rhythm, etc. )
	rhetoric (dialogue, metaphor, etc.)
affixes de- (demolish, destroy, etc.), ex- (extract, , explore, explain, etc.), re- (reread, retell, retry, etc.), -ate (locate, excavate, etc.), -ent (apparent, present, turbulent, etc.), -ct (correct, erect, etc.)	roots for creation of new words ( )
	affixes -ism (humanism, mechanism, aphorism, etc.), -ist (protagonist, terrorist, cyclist, etc.), anti- (antibody, antidote, antibiotic, etc.), di- (digest, diverse, etc.), neo- (neo-realism, neo-conservatism, etc.)
Greco-Latin Hybrids (words one part of which is Greek and the other one – Latin): e.g. tele-graph, socio-logy, tele-vision, etc.

Fate of these Borrowings in English: Many of them underwent a shift of meaning: e.g. Lat. musculus (literally “little mouse”) à Eng. muscle; Gr. kosmos (“universe”) à Eng. cosmetics; Gr. climax (“ladder”) à Eng. climax (the top of something). Many of them formed the basis for international terminology:

e.g. Latin borrowings: facsimile, introvert, radioactive, relativity, etc.; Greek borrowings: allergy, antibiotic, hormone, protein, stratosphere, etc. Many of them increased the number synonyms in English: