Usually, birds of a feather flock together—but in the Amazon, some flocks feature dozens of species of all shapes and colors. A new study by San Francisco State University biologists singles out one reason why these unusually diverse flocks exist: lookout species that call in alarm when they spot dangerous predators.

Researchers have pondered the existence of these mixed-species flocks for decades, especially because of their stability. “You come back to the same habitat after 20 years, and the same flocks are using the same areas of the forest,” explained San Francisco State Professor of Biology Vance Vredenburg. “It defies a lot of expectations.”

But scientists did have a few clues. One ubiquitous group of flock members are species whose calls alert their neighbors to the presence of threats like hawks or falcons. “People have thought for a while that maybe these ‘sentinels’ promote the ability of other species to use risky parts of the forest,” said lead author Ari Martinez, who was a postdoctoral researcher at SF State during the study. By opening up new habitat to their neighbors, they might also bring together species that would normally flock on their own.

To put that idea to the test, the team captured alarm-calling dusky-throated antshrikes (Thamnomanes ardesiacus) from eight mixed-species flocks in southeastern Peru and kept each bird in an aviary for several days.

After the team removed the antshrikes, birds in each flock responded in a matter of hours. In three flocks, birds retreated to areas of denser cover at the same vertical level in the forest, while in another the members joined new flocks high in the canopy, another area that affords more cover from predators. Birds in control flocks, where the researchers captured antshrikes but immediately released them, tended to stay out in the open. The team reported their results today in the journal Ecology.

The results support the idea that alarm-calling species might allow their neighbors to live in dangerous neighborhoods. “These flocks occupy a middle layer of the rainforest that’s not quite the ground and not quite the canopy,” explained coauthor Eliseo Parra, a lecturer and researcher at San Francisco State. “A lot of literature suggests that this area is more dangerous. There are more opportunities for a predator to be hidden and still have a quick flight path.” Remove the antshrikes and their former flockmates are left exposed, so they retreat to safer habitats.

Another consequence of the removal is that almost all of the members of mixed-species flocks spent less time with the bulk of the flock. “Some species would retreat to one habitat, and some individuals to another,” said Parra. “From an anecdotal perspective, you no longer saw a flock.”

Even if they don’t look the part, this makes alarm-calling birds similar to “keystone species” that have an unusually big effect on their environment, like beavers and wolves. Antshrikes may not have a large impact on their physical environment, but they influence the behavior of many other species by creating a safe zone from predators. “It’s a way that species diversity might be maintained in the forest,” said Martinez, adding that this could make them valuable targets for conservation efforts. 

Amazonia, tasks

 Task1. Find words/ expressions meaning the following:

1.  to pick out , choose;

2.  to think about (something) carefully;

3.  an aviary is a large cage or covered area in which birds are kept;

4.  to set free;

5.  a result or effect;

6.  to move away from something or someone.;

7.  cause or enable (a condition or situation) to continue

Task2 Say whether the following is true, false or not mentioned.

1.  Some birds in a flock are always on the alert and warn the other birds whenever there is danger.

2.  Scientists say it’s a wonder predators ever beat the system

3.  They argue that these alarm-calling species are vital, and that conservation efforts should focus on them in the future.

4.  For a long time scientists had no idea what made birds of different species flock together and why these flocks were so stable.

5.  When they caught the sentinel birds and kept them away from flocks, the flocks either chose another area or disintegrated.

6.  Birds occupying the canopy are at greater risk than others.

7.  By acting as an alarm sounding system, the sentinel birds open up parts of the forest to other bird species that may have previously found the habitat too risky, in turn allowing species that may not o previously met to mix.

8.  Scientists intend to pay more attention to the complex communications that are alarm calls.

Task3 Answer the following questions.

1.  Why were biologists from San Francisco university surprised?

2.  What explanations did they come up with?

3.  How did they check their ideas?

4.  What did the experiment show?

5.  What level of the forest is the most dangerous?

6.  Why is it more dangerous than the others?

7.  What part ,in terms of ecology, do sentinel birds play?